Melody Fwygon

Imagine if this plate display could be driven by a low-end smartphone app running software that keeps GPS track of the vehicle;

• When the vehicle is parked at home; it displays a decoy/vanity/decorative plate.
• When the vehicle is on the road; at reasonable speeds it displays the “Default” Legal plate number…unless you signal it not to.
• When the vehicle is speeding or near a known ALPR camera; it shifts the plate number to a randomly numbered decoy plate number.
• When the vehicle is parked somewhere else; it chooses a random plate number and shifts that number every 1-2 hours at random odd intervals.
• When you toggle a certain setting on your personal device; it just sticks to a random plate number or current plate for an hour or two. (So you can get out of sight before it shifts again, in case you’re being watched.)

Judging strictly by the article; it feels like this case is weak as a wet paper bag.

How do you prove that the diseases you experienced were not ones you were unknowingly predisposed to? Do they have some proof?

Something tells me that this is a paper tiger of a case. I don’t get the feeling they’re going to be able to prove it well enough. Being able to make the assertions that this case does as facts REQUIRES DECADES OF SCIENTIFIC DATA!

I shouldn’t be able to read the defendant’s statement and be able to agree with it. The fact that I can agree with it bothers me when I know how negligent these companies typically are. I hope I’m wrong; because if this case flops; it gives them an easy out.