and fuck the UK goverment

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Have you never done one of these for an ID check? Doesn’t work like that, it will likely ask you to turn your head so it can take a “3D” scan.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I never have had to do one of these, and I promise I’m not deliberately trying to ask stupid questions. Would this system be fooled by holding up a mannequin head?

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Nobody has created some sort of fake virtual camera thing? Like it appears in device manager as a real webcam, but the output is altered?

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        I’d assume that this is something that can be most-easily bypassed at the browser level if a site can request access to a camera.

        I don’t think that any trusted-to-the-camera hardware stack exists today.

        But at an OS level…

        I dunno about Windows, but Linux can do virtual video-4-linux devices, which is probably how the OS exposes a camera to a browser on Linux.

        https://github.com/v4l2loopback/v4l2loopback

        This module allows you to create “virtual video devices”. Normal (v4l2) applications will read these devices as if they were ordinary video devices, but the video will not be read from e.g. a capture card but instead it is generated by another application.